📈 A dramatic 110-billion-yen ($690 million) swing. On April 27, 2026, Nissan revised its full-year operating outlook from a 60-billion-yen loss to a 50-billion-yen profit — the first piece of "black ink" delivered to investors since CEO Ivan Espinosa took over and went it alone after the failed merger with Honda. But beneath the headline, a 550-billion-yen ($3.5 billion) net loss still tells a more complicated story about where Japan's embattled No. 3 automaker — and the global car industry — really stands.

What changed, in numbers

Nissan announced the upward revision after the close of trading on the Tokyo Stock Exchange on April 27, 2026. To avoid date confusion: this covers Japan's "fiscal 2025" — the 12 months running from April 2025 through March 2026, which had just ended.

The revised outlook breaks down as follows. Operating income flipped from a previously forecast 60-billion-yen loss (about $380 million) to a 50-billion-yen profit (about $310 million), a 110-billion-yen ($690 million) swing. Revenue was lifted from 11.9 trillion yen to 12 trillion yen (about $75.5 billion at roughly 159 yen to the dollar). The net loss forecast narrowed from 650 billion yen to 550 billion yen — still a $3.5 billion shortfall, but smaller than feared.

Worth pausing on the bottom line: Nissan is still expected to post a hefty net loss for a second straight year. The previous fiscal year (FY2024, ending March 2025) closed with a 670.8-billion-yen net loss, on par with the crisis that pushed Nissan into the arms of Renault a quarter-century ago. Even the upgraded forecast, while better than the QUICK consensus estimate of a 578-billion-yen loss, doesn't change that picture.

Three ingredients in the swing to operating profit

Nissan's own announcement attributes the operating-profit swing to three drivers — and one of them deserves an asterisk.

1. Reversal of US greenhouse-gas provisions. This was the single biggest one-off contributor. Under the Trump administration, the United States repealed its greenhouse-gas emissions rules for vehicles. Nissan had been carrying provisions on its books to cover potential future violations of those rules. With the rules gone, those provisions could be reversed — and reversed provisions flow back into the income statement as profit.

2. Cost cuts running ahead of plan. Under the "Re:Nissan" turnaround plan, the company has targeted 500 billion yen ($3.1 billion) in combined fixed and variable cost savings versus FY2024. As of February 2026, fixed-cost reductions had already reached 160 billion yen ($1.0 billion), with management confident of beating an interim target of 250 billion yen ($1.6 billion).

3. A weaker yen. Nissan's original FY2025 guidance assumed a USD/JPY rate around 146 yen. The actual rate hovered between 158 and 159 yen — significantly weaker than expected. For an exporter like Nissan, every yen of weakness translates to billions of yen in additional operating profit.

The asterisk: only the second factor reflects a genuine, repeatable improvement in the business. The first is one-and-done, and the third is anyone's guess from one quarter to the next.

Inside Re:Nissan: a painful restructuring

To understand why this matters, it helps to recap the "Re:Nissan" plan that CEO Espinosa unveiled in May 2025. It rests on three pillars.

First, headcount. Nissan is cutting 20,000 jobs globally — about 15% of its workforce — building on the 9,000 layoffs announced in late 2024. In the United States, the company has reopened voluntary retirement programs at an assembly plant in Mississippi and frozen performance-linked pay.

Second, plants. Seven of Nissan's 17 vehicle assembly plants will be consolidated, leaving 10. In Japan, the flagship Oppama plant in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture — long considered Nissan's "mother plant" — will end vehicle production by the end of FY2027. The Shonan plant of subsidiary Nissan Shatai, which builds commercial vans, ends new-vehicle production a year earlier, in FY2026. Overseas, the Civac plant in Morelos, Mexico, halted production by March 2026, ending nearly six decades of operation. Reports have linked Taiwan's Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry) to a possible joint use of the Oppama site, but no concrete plan has been announced. Local governments and supplier networks have publicly urged Nissan to keep the facilities running in some form.

Third, supplier relationships and engineering efficiency. Nissan is reducing parts counts, cutting engineering hours per vehicle by a targeted 20% (currently at 15%), and rationalizing R&D spending.

Japanese business magazine Nikkei Business characterized the plan as "a break with the volume-chasing management that began in the Carlos Ghosn era," with the new leadership pivoting from scale to profitability. The same publication noted, however, that Nissan's previous four medium-term plans had all missed their targets, leaving analysts cautious about execution.

The shadow of the failed Honda merger

The upward revision has another layer of context: the collapse of merger talks with Honda in February 2025.

In December 2024, Honda and Nissan signed a memorandum of understanding aimed at a full integration, with a deadline of late January 2025 for a final decision. Had it succeeded, the combined entity would have been the world's third-largest automaker by volume. But Honda pushed for a structure in which Nissan would become a subsidiary, while Nissan insisted on a relationship between equals. Given Honda's market capitalization roughly five times Nissan's, Honda's position had its own logic — but the governance gap proved too wide to bridge.

After the breakdown, Nissan installed Ivan Espinosa as CEO in April 2025 and pivoted decisively to a go-it-alone path. Renault has been gradually unwinding its capital ties, and Foxconn has been linked to a possible stake in Nissan, leaving the surrounding landscape fluid. Espinosa has spoken of "taboo-free partnerships" but has kept product strategy firmly under Nissan's control.

The April 2026 upward revision is, in that sense, the first real test of the independent path — and it's a pass, just barely. A 50-billion-yen operating profit looks small against Honda's projected FY2026 net loss of up to 690 billion yen ($4.3 billion) or Toyota's expected operating profit on the order of trillions of yen, making it hard to read the swing as more than "back from the brink."

Same day, opposite story: Toyota

By coincidence, on the very same day Nissan announced its revision — April 27, 2026 — Toyota reported record global sales for FY2025. Toyota's "multi-pathway" strategy of developing hybrids, plug-in hybrids, EVs and fuel-cell vehicles in parallel has paid off as hybrid demand has surged worldwide. In some recent months, more than half of Toyota's North American sales have been electrified vehicles (HEVs, PHEVs and BEVs combined).

The contrast highlights how differently two Japanese automakers can read the same EV transition. Nissan was once the Japanese pioneer of mass-market EVs with the original Leaf, but is now repositioning itself closer to a Toyota-style mix, with its own e-POWER series-hybrid system at the core of its product strategy.

How this fits the global automaker reshuffle

Nissan's story is part of a broader reshuffle now playing out across the global auto industry.

In the United States, Ford booked roughly $19.5 billion in EV-related impairments and ended F-150 Lightning production. Stellantis — parent of Jeep, Ram and Fiat — took about $26 billion in charges tied to battery-electric programs. As of April 2026, General Motors was reported to have paused development of next-generation electric pickups including a future Chevrolet Silverado EV and GMC Sierra EV in favor of internal-combustion and hybrid platforms (GM has partly disputed those reports).

More than 20 brands worldwide — including Hyundai, Volkswagen and Volvo — have publicly delayed or scaled back EV programs. The competitive picture has hardened around two dominant pure EV players: Tesla, with its vertically integrated cost structure, and BYD, with deep Chinese supply chains and aggressive pricing.

Read in that light, Nissan's upward revision can be framed as the result of moving early on EV-strategy reassessment and front-loading the painful restructuring — getting to a small operating profit ahead of some peers. The flip side: meaningful profit recovery still requires waiting until FY2026 (April 2026 through March 2027), the year Espinosa has flagged as the target for positive automotive operating profit and free cash flow excluding tariff effects.

What's still hanging over the company

Three caveats sit underneath the headline.

First, the US emissions provision reversal is plainly one-off. The benefit doesn't repeat in FY2026.

Second, the weak yen isn't guaranteed to last. The Bank of Japan has been signaling a path toward policy normalization, and any US rate cuts would tend to push the yen back up.

Third, US tariffs remain a drag. Japanese automakers face a 15% tariff under a July 2025 trade arrangement (down from a previous 27.5%, in effect since mid-September 2025). Nissan disclosed in February 2026 that tariffs had cut roughly 68.7 billion yen ($430 million) out of operating profit.

In other words, the swing to operating profit is a mix of structural progress, a one-time gift, and favorable currency — a kind of momentary calm. Whether Nissan has truly turned the corner will only become clear in FY2026 results and beyond, as the new Leaf, the Juke EV, the China-developed N7, and the rumored revivals of the Skyline, GT-R and Xterra reach the market.

In Japan, debate is heated among auto enthusiasts and investors over whether Nissan can really pull off its turnaround, and whether walking away from the Honda merger was the right call. What about your country? When a long-established domestic automaker goes through deep restructuring — plant closures, mass layoffs — how does the public usually react? We'd love to hear your perspective.

References